Data science /

Getting meaning from text: self-attention step-by-step video

September 1 2020/20 min read

In October 2019, Google announced that it would process search queries with the BERT model that their researchers have developed. This model can grasp difficult nuances of language: in the search 2019 brazil traveler to usa need a visa, it is understood that the traveler is Brazilian, and the destination is the USA. From now on, Google says, this search returns the page of the U.S. embassy in Brazil, and no longer shows a page about U.S. citizens traveling to Brazil. 

Remarkably, most of the attention mechanism at the core of many transformer models like BERT relies on just a few basic vector operations.

Let’s see how it works. 

What’s the matter with context?

If you see the word bank, you might think about a financial institution, the office where your advisor works, the portable battery that charges your phone on the move, or even the edge of a lake or river.
If you’re given more context, as in It's a pleasant walk by the river bank, you can realize that bank goes well with river, so it must mean the land next to some water. You could also realize that you can walk by this bank, so it must look like a footpath along the river. The whole sentence adds up to create a mental picture of bank. 

Self-attention seeks to do the very same thing. 

Word embedding

A word like bank, called a token when it represents a fundamental piece of text, is commonly encoded as a vector of real, continuous values: the embedding vector. 

Determining the values inside the embedding vector of a token is a large part of the heavy lifting in text processing. Thankfully, with hundreds of dimensions available to organize the vocabulary of known tokens, embeddings can be pretrained to relate numerically in ways that reflect how their tokens relate in natural language.

How to contextualize the embeddings?

The key to the state of the art performance in Natural Language Processing (NLP) is to transform the embeddings to create the right numerical picture from the tokens in any given sentence. 

This is what the scaled dot-product self-attention mechanism does elegantly with (mostly) a few operations of linear algebra.

Self-attention mechanism

  • Token relationships
    The words in a sentence sometimes relate to each other, like river and bank, and sometimes they don't. To determine how related two tokens are, attention simply calculates the scalar product between their embeddings.
    We can imagine that the embeddings of bank and river are more similar, since they should both encode the aspect of nature, so that their scalar product should be higher than if the tokens were completely unrelated.  
  • Keys, queries, and values
    Unfortunately, calculating the scalar product directly on the embeddings would simply tend to give higher values when two tokens are very similar tokens and give smaller values otherwise. But what grammatical analysis taught us is that important relationships can happen between words that can be completely different: a subject and a verb, a preposition and a complement, etc.
    To have more flexibility, the embeddings go through different linear projections so that one embedding creates a key, a query, and a value vector. The projections allow us to select which components of the embeddings to focus on and to orient them, so that the scalar products between the keys and the queries represent the relationships that matter.
  • Activations
    The scalar products between a query and the keys, which give the level of relationship between the query’s token and every other token, are typically scaled down for numerical stability, then passed through a softmax activation function.
    The softmax makes large relationships exponentially more significant. Since this operation is non-linear, it also means that self-attention can be re-applied several times to achieve more and more complex transformations, making the process deep learning.
  • Linear combinations
    New contextualizedembeddings are created by combining the values corresponding to every input token, in proportions given by the results of the softmax function: if the query of the river token has a strong relationship with the key of the bank token, the value of bank is added in large part to the contextualized embedding for river.

Multi-head attention and BERT

A single sequence of input embeddings can be projected using many different sets of key, query, and value projections in what is called multi-head attention. Each projection set can focus on calculating different types of relationships between the tokens and create specific contextualized embeddings. 

The contextualized embeddings coming from different attention heads are simply concatenated together. 

Multi-head attention

Deep learning models for Natural Language Processing typically apply many layers of multi-head attention, and mix in extra operations to get robust results. 

For instance, the BERT Encoder uses the WordPiece embeddings of tokens but always begins by adding them to positional embeddings. This step gives information about the order of the tokens in the input sentence, which self-attention would not consider otherwise.

Additional linear projections, normalization, and feed-forward layers give the whole model more flexibility and stability.

The result is a model that can remove ambiguity from natural text and reduce it to precise values that you can use to automatically search, classify, or even annotate text content.

BERT processes a sentence to output contextualized embeddings that are more representative of the true meaning

Read more

Literature
Online resources
  • Romain Futrzynski

    Romain Futrzynski

    Senior Application Engineer

    Romain Futrzynski an application engineer at Peltarion. He has several years of experience working in Computational Fluid Dynamics, notably to ensure customer success of simulation engineers at Siemens Digital Industries Software. Romain is passionate about computer science and deep learning, and about sharing knowledge between all branches of AI and Engineering. He has a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from KTH.

02/ More on Data science